Hi Deven,
Could you give us more details or maybe point out in a screenshot what is not matching? At first, I'd suggest to take a look at the capacity consumptions specified in the PDS/PPM.
Also I'd check whether there are PP/DS orders in the buckets which do not match - if unmatching blocks have PP/DS orders, perhaps these are not consuming capacity at the moment, so quantity in Production Planned figure is higher than shown in capacity view.
Regards,
Tiago
Hi Yuan,
When displaying an order at the Order View, transaction /SAPAPO/RRP2, you can get the OrderID with the following steps:
1) Open the debugger by using ok-code /h and pressing enter twice.
2) Display the following variable: GT_ORDERS[1]-ORDERID
I described this with screenshots in SCN Document How to read order details from the liveCache with FM /SAPAPO/OM_ORDER_GET_DATA.
Regards,
Tiago
Hi Jaisree,
Did you maintain the blocks manually or add them as a reference cycle? SAP_CDPBP_02 works based on cycle definitions. Please, make sure that there is a Cycle Start and a Cycle End in the blocks. Then, it should be possible to execute the heuristic for a block that is inside that cycle - if there is an overload in the selected block, the limits will be adjusted so that all activities can be scheduled.
Other than that, SAP_CDPBP_02 will call SAP_CDPBP_01 as a follow-up heuristic to reschedule the activities in the adjusted blocks.
The strategy settings used by SAP_CDPBP_01 are hardcoded, such that changing Strategy Profile will not affect the behavior. The exact strategy can be seen in SAP_CDPBP_01's documentation in /SAPAPO/CDPSC11.
Regards,
Tiago
Hi Christine,
When a downtime is created for a Resource, liveCache automatically reschedules the activities such that they will neither start nor end during the downtime, but this automatic reschedulling is not necessarily optimal.
Due to this, it is recommended to execute the Reschedule function or a DS heuristic for the Resource to adjust planning after creating downtimes .
Regards,
Tiago
Hi Mohan,
I got it to work, the ABAPER had not properly activated the BADI. I just went to the BADI and checked the status, where is showed de-activated, I just asked the Developer to Activate it. If you show me all the details of your Classes and Characteristics, such as the configuration of your Organizational Area, I could probably debug your issue.
Cheers,
Bruce
Hi Rajan,
Exactly, usually the Orders Chart and/or Network View are used to display the requirements.
For Safety Stock, a possibility is to use Safety Stock elements in the liveCache (in /SAPAPO/MVM, setting Take Safety Stock into Account with value 3). This way, the safety stock demands will exist just like any other demand.
I'm not sure about question 2, could you clarify it with a screenshot?
Regards,
Tiago
Hi All,
Let me clarify little more.. so that if possible you can understand my scenario....
There is PO in ECC having quantity - 100
This PO is composed of two material M1 & M2 at the same location and material M1 has quantity 75 and M2 has 25..
one of the PO quantity say for Material M2 is deleted.
Now APO planning book should show In-transit value at M1 = 75 and M2 = 0.
But in APO - M1 is showing 100 quantity and M2 is showing correctly as 0.
I activated the PO IM but no success.
I checked /SAPAPO/RRP3 and the M1 has the PO memo of quantity 100 and M2 has nothing.
Let me know if you have any further question...
Regards,
Prabhat
I am confused what the issue it?
A PO is for a material and plant combination.
The PO may have multiple materials in it.
But the quantities are per material.
So why do you say the PO in ECC is for 100 units?
You meant to say you have a PO in ECC that is for 75 units of material 1 and 25 units of material 2?
A PO does not show as InTransit in APO. A PO is a PO. It shows up as Distribution Receipts in APO.
Is the issue with PRoduct View /sapapo/RRP3 or your Planning Book.
You created the Planning Book so we can't debug your planning book.
CIF will not combine the quantities for 2 separate materials into a single material.
Hello,
My users have asked if it's possible to have a product on Product Allocation, but have a way to automatically have some customers do ATP checks only (bypassing allocation completely)
Product A/Location A/Customer A - order to perform an ATP and Allocation check
Product A/Location A/Customer B - order to perform an ATP check only
Today if an order is on allocation for some reason we need to skip that check, we can go into the Sales order in ECC and change the Item Requirement type on the Procurement tab to trigger an ATP only check. However, that's a manual process and can be very time consuming when you have a large volume of orders.
The business does not want the product off allocation, but sounds like they don't want it full on either. I'm not aware of anything in ECC or SCM that can handle this requirement. I've mentioned the wildcard option in the allocation setup, but looking for more options if possible. Any suggestions?
Thank you in advance,
Jodi Martin
Hi Kenneth,
Let's make it short...
The MRP element of the order in MD04 is "ShpgNt" and this is getting transferred as "PO memo" in /SAPAPO/RRP3.
Material M1 is showing the order quantity as 100 in both MD04 and RRP3.
But when I go ME23N to see the order i.e. PO -- I find that the quantity of 25 units of material M2 is deleted.
So Ideally the material M1 should show only 75 units but is showing the full value of 100 units.How this is possible?
Regards,
Prabhat
Jodi,
Wildcard is the common solution. I don't know why you would look for another solution.
Best Regards,
DB49
A PO memo is not a PO. Do you know the steps that was taken to create this PO memo?
Do you have issues with other PO's and PO memo's or just this one?
are you using EDI ASN's to update these PO's or manually or what?
What do you see in RRP3?
Hi Brahmankar,
Checked the note 1875055 its already applied in our system.
But still order with unspecified characteristics message in warning alerts are there. I checked completely that products receipts and requirements all the characteristics values are maintained properly.
Regards,
Vimal
Satyanarayana,
Execution-type steps are typically carried out in ECC, not APO. APO in general is intended to be a planning system, not an execution system.
If it is your intention to print reports in APO, you will probably have to create them yourself.
Best Regards,
DB49
Hi All,
Hope experts will share their views.
When I am performing the consistency checks for the product variants between APO & R/3 using /n/sapapo/comp_variant. I am facing the issue as
"Configuration for product & and in location & is not consistent. Message no: /SAPAPO/CONFR016
Diagnosis
The valuation for the product variant is different form the valuation for the material variant in the R/3 System
Procedure
Transfer the material again from the R/3 system to SAP APP
I was retransferring the material master to SAP APO again. But still the inconsistent message is there. We are activating CDP and the materials are configurable products. So before transferring the products, class & characteristics are transferred by then transferring the products.
Regards,
Vimal
Hi Tiago,
Thanks again,
Please find below the screen shots,
The example shown below is a stock transport requisition (created as a outcome of a purchase requisition at a distribution center which procures from an external plant) at the producing plant with Rec/Req Qty. as -1000.
Ideally this should be displayed as -1000PC in the DS board when I configure the demand elements to display the order quantity, but in this case, it displays as 1000 PCs which is not correct.
Please shed some light on this.
Thanks,
Rajan.
Hi Satya,
Expert Dogboy have already answered your Question, Being new am not sure whether you understood fully or not.
However, being you're new to APO - We Welcome you.
Remember - Always explore yourself the SCN forum or google around to find answer yourself.
All the steps you wanted to know from SA creation --> Transferring them to APO etc are already very much available here.
Few links for your questions are below.
APO Sales Scheduling Agreement - External Procurement - SAP Library
Integration of Scheduling Agreements - Integration via APO Core Interface (CIF) - SAP Library
Transferring APO scheduling agreeement through CIF
Buckle your Shoes - Start Exploring 
Just my Thoughts
Vinoth
Hi Vimal,
Try running the CCR directly without the Variant Saved.
OR
Try deleting/Editing the variant and save it again and then execute CCR from variant.
I guess some data (Tax related data) have been changed between the time the Variant got saved and your CCR execution.
Question - what you mean by " So before transferring the products, class & characteristics are transferred by then transferring the products."
Just my thoughts
Vinoth
Satya,
This thread looks to be a duplication.
Pls close this thread.
you can follow the other one you've posted for the same reason.
How to create a delivery schedules and print delivery schedules in APO for external procurement
Regards
Vinoth
Hi Beatriz,
Have you analyzed the Deployment logs correctly ? If the ATD quantity is 100 for the bucket, then you need to analyze the different horizons first. One such horizon would be SNP checking horizon .