Hi All,
I am not sure if you talking about following scenariosCTM had issue with Phantoms. We did characteristic based planning and use planning KMAT. Here are the issue we faced--
Case#1- Multiple Direct Components--Component A and component B are each present twice, with different dependency conditions. After the CTM run, all components are to be seen in the planned orders, even if not matching the selection conditions.
Case#2- Multiple Direct Components and Phantom Components- component A is a direct component of the PDS as well as a component of Phantom 2. Component D is a direct component of the PDS as well as a component of Phantom 1.Component A and D are thus each present twice, with different dependency conditions. After the CTM run, all components are to be seen in the planned orders, even if not matching the selection conditions.
Case#3- Multiple Components within Distinct Phantoms --component B is a component of Phantom 1 as well as of Phantom 2. Different dependency conditions exist for the two phantoms and, as a consequence, also for the two components B. After the CTM run, both components B are to be seen in the planned orders, even if not matching the selection conditions.
Case#4- Multiple Phantoms-- Phantom 1 is present twice, its components - component B and C -are therefore also present twice. Different dependency conditions exist for the two occurrences of the phantom. After the CTM run, both components B and both components C are to be seen in the planned orders, even if not matching the selection conditions.
